| |
Subject |
Author |
Date Posted |
Forum
|
 |
RE: When did we get the right to speed?
Well, when this forum turns into way for others to attack someone's opinions or views, it looses it's value for me. I have enjoyed years of pleasant exchanges here, but that has changed of late.
To those who have to approach issues this way, I have no time for you. To those I have enjoyed in the past, I will miss your questions and insight.
Goodbye. :B
|
sailor53
|
03/31/12 11:15am |
Around the Campfire
|
|
RE: When did we get the right to speed?
The problem here is just plain arrogance. You feel you can use fuel any way you choose, and that's okay, but others need to conserve.
I find this confusing. I don't use fuel any way I choose. I use it the most efficient way I can.
There are many ways to conserve fuel other than not speeding. I check the tire pressures routinely, maintain our wheel alignment, eliminate unneeded items from our load, take routes that avoid large grades, and avoid a heavy foot.
I believe your statement says more about you than anything else. In your posts you say you speed because it is your choice, but other's driving habits annoy you and should be changed.
Go figure. :h
|
sailor53
|
03/30/12 12:44pm |
Around the Campfire
|
|
RE: When did we get the right to speed?
I also find it funny for someone or anyone pulling or driving an RV to complain "about other people" wasting fuel."
I think you miss the point. No, I am sure you miss the point. The idea is for all of us to drive more efficiently, regardless of what we are driving and for whatever reason, to conserve a valuable resource. :S
If you feel RV'ing is a "waste of fuel", then maybe you should find another pastime. :B
|
sailor53
|
03/30/12 12:04pm |
Around the Campfire
|
|
RE: When did we get the right to speed?
Your question is "rhetorical" it comes with a built in answer for those that agree with your premise that all of us, somehow, are responsible for the prudent use of a limited resource--fuel. Of course the real answer is that we aren't, none of us, responsible for some mythical "fair" amount of fuel. Each of us has the right to use as much as we can afford and I guess speeders have the funds to use fuel as THEY, not you or I, see fit.
We do have a "right" to demand that drivers obey the speed limit because they endanger us personally--which is what speed limit laws were originally written to address.
To believe your statement would assume that I meant to say that if a vehicle was more efficient a 55 mph, it would be irresponsible to drive at a posted speed limit above that. I did no such thing.
The point is that those who choose to speed are, beyond breaking the law, squandering a valuable resource. Yes, it is their choice to use their money and fuel as they wish. I was only attempting to offer a choice which has benefits for us all for various reasons.
Those that argue that the "10 mph buffer" exists because of limitations of speedometers, I can't believe with today's technology that an error that great is possible without modifications to the vehicle such as tire size changes. I believe that law enforcement agencies don't enforce lower violations in other than school zones, construction zones, and speed problem areas is that the shear volume of tickets would overload the system. I agree this may change as many jurisdictions are being forced to find funds in other ways beyond tax income. JMHO
|
sailor53
|
03/29/12 12:25pm |
Around the Campfire
|
|
RE: When did we get the right to speed?
I get it that you're annoyed by speeding drivers. Me too. Just don't try to make it a matter of national security. Be honest with yourself. Or else sell the RV and buy a Volt.
I already do my part, but I can't make up for your waste, too. Also, what would the weight police say if tried to tow our 5'er with a Volt.
Get real! :S
|
sailor53
|
03/29/12 10:23am |
Around the Campfire
|
|
RE: When did we get the right to speed?
If we maintain our dependence on foreign oil, we will have a sword hanging over our heads. Just look at current events and the way Iran is effecting the global economy, our recovery from the recession, and the price at the pumps. Anybody enjoying that?.
This is just a red herring, and you know it! We are not going to reduce our dependence on foreign oil by driving our 10mpg tow vehicle at the speed limit or less.
Some of us will continue to attempt to justify their actions and ignore the truth until, in this case, it kills you and takes the innocent with you. If you will remember, I wasn't only talking about RV's, but all vehicles. Also, I never once mentioned driving below the speed limit though, if conditions warrant it, it wouldn't be a bad idea. If by slowing down increased your miles per gallon, yes, that would effect the amount of oil necessary to satisfy demand.
If we keep going as we have, perhaps we need to install governors on our vehicles to force compliance with the law for those who choose to defy it. JMHO
|
sailor53
|
03/29/12 09:56am |
Around the Campfire
|
|
RE: When did we get the right to speed?
Gas consumption? Really? And you have an RV? That's a good one. If you were really interested in saving fuel you'd sell the RV, get a car that gets over 50mpg and stay in hotels.
If you re-read the OP you will see that we are full-timers. We sold the house so we could travel throughout our nation and our neighbor's and see the sights before we were too old to enjoy them. Yes, the truck and trailer use more fuel than an economy car, but it costs far less than it took to maintain our old S&B's and pay for rental cars and hotels. Just compute the difference in fuel consumption and cost by going 75 mph and 55 mph and maybe you will get a wakeup call regardless of the speed limit. The purpose of my post, for those that are interested, was to point out the value of the savings possible, increased safety, and the satisfaction of actually obeying the law of the land.
If we maintain our dependence on foreign oil, we will have a sword hanging over our heads. Just look at current events and the way Iran is effecting the global economy, our recovery from the recession, and the price at the pumps. Anybody enjoying that?.
|
sailor53
|
03/29/12 09:13am |
Around the Campfire
|
|
RE: When did we get the right to speed?
So what is your rant? Does the act of speeding offend you? Personally I don't care about people speeding as much as I do people who make reckless driving moves; ie tail-gating, cutting vehicles off, texting while driving, or even driving too slow in a fast lane.
Personally I never drive faster than 65 and never faster than 55 while towing. I like my money and hate to waste it on fuel and premature vehicle wear.
First, I didn't use the word "rant" anywhere in my post. Speeding doesn't offend me though it does bother me for the reasons I mentioned.
Second, I was simply pointing out how we as a nation waste fuel by speeding. One thing I didn't mention is how speeding is also a direct contributor to accidents.
The other items you mentioned our worthy of examination, also. Perhaps someone else will address them in their own thread. You, maybe? I already have my own windmill to deal with.
|
sailor53
|
03/28/12 11:33pm |
Around the Campfire
|
|
When did we get the right to speed?
This topic has been moved to another forum.
You can read it here: 25928335
|
sailor53
|
03/28/12 11:09pm |
Fifth-Wheels
|
|
When did we get the right to speed?
I know this thread is going to inflame some to the point of rage, but here goes.
We have been traveling throughout this great nation covering thirty six states the last three years after we became full-timers. We couldn't help but notice that many people speed and are annoyed by anyone who gets in their way. They seem to believe that the actual speed limit is about ten mph above the posted limit. For some, this isn't enough to satisfy their need for speed. This attitude can be found in all age groups, all types of vehicles (RV's included), and with all types of road conditions.
My question is: Why can't these drivers obey the speed limit as posted? Given the present economical situation and availability and price of fuel, slowing down would conserve this resource. We all talk about how our dependence on foreign oil is bringing our nation down one barrel at a time. Obeying the speed limit or, more importantly, slowing down would reduce the consumption of fuel throughout the nation permitting a reduction of the oil we import.
Some would argue that a reduction of demand could actually drive up prices at the pump. If this were true, it would be offset by a increase in the mpg we would enjoy. For the tree huggers (not meant as an insult), our carbon footprint would be reduced by driving at a more efficient speed.
I bring all this up to encourage a free exchange of views and opinions. Let the exchange begin! :B
|
sailor53
|
03/28/12 11:09pm |
Around the Campfire
|
 |
RE: Extra gas can?
We carry 2 five gallon jerry cans along with the 40 gallons in our auxiliary tank to supplement the 38 gallons in the OEM tank. Some may call this over-kill, but we do this so we can price shop for our fuel. The price can vary 30-40 cents across state lines and the savings can really mount up at 10 miles to a gallon and 70 gallon fillups. JMHO
|
sailor53
|
03/25/12 10:25pm |
Full-time RVing
|
|
RE: New fiver-new map?
It's your choice. If you want it to show where you have been with the new rig, start over. I would transfer the states where you have been as I think they show your RV'ing experiences as a whole. JMHO
|
sailor53
|
03/17/12 06:18pm |
General RVing Issues
|
|
RE: help - power issue...
Do you have a 50 amp service?If yes maybe you lost a leg of the circuit.
Buc1980, good thought.. Yes, I am on a 50amp Circuit. I will switch to the 30amp and see what happens.
Buc - that did it. I switched from the 50amp outlet to the 30amp outlet and that fixed the problem. Thanks!! Great suggestion. It is nice to know that it is not my camper.
-Chris
Good info ! I'm going to file that for future reference!
Good job, guys! I would have the CG check the pedestal before you have other problems. JMHO
|
sailor53
|
03/17/12 06:14pm |
Fifth-Wheels
|
|
RE: help - power issue...
Just a thought, Did you check the wires on the breakers to see if they are still attached properly.
Sounds good to me.
|
sailor53
|
03/17/12 06:09pm |
Fifth-Wheels
|
|
RE: Greasable bolts and thicker spring shakles ???
Do these products change the ride height?
Since going to 16" tires I can't afford to lose any height.
Ron W.
Ours appears to have not changed at all.
|
sailor53
|
03/17/12 05:52am |
Fifth-Wheels
|
|
RE: Greasable bolts and thicker spring shakles ???
I had these installed while we were traveling through Indiana. Mor/Ryde has a top-notch service department with great people from top to bottom.
|
sailor53
|
03/16/12 01:48pm |
Fifth-Wheels
|
|
RE: All Ford Powerstroke owners, please watch this video
It is posts like the one Capt Skup made that make this forum the great one it is. He is known to offer his opinion and insight, never confusing the two. He is an example of what we all should expire. He found important information, passed it on, and, without flaming the manufacturer, provided the links to view the video. A very concise post without the embroidery. :B
And, no, I am not Capt Skup using another member name. :W
|
sailor53
|
03/07/12 07:10pm |
Tow Vehicles
|
|
RE: All Ford Powerstroke owners, please watch this video
I checked my cap and I have the "newer" style factory cap.
I went and purchased the Slant Cap from Advance up the street and installed it.
Everything looked just like in the video. $4.99 plus tax.
I have subscribed to that site for news letters.
Thanks for posting, Capt Skup!!!
Pat
He mentioned in the video that the new cap came out in 2009. Of course, that doesn't mean that Ford didn't try to clear out their inventory of older caps before installing the new design as they went out the door.
|
sailor53
|
03/07/12 05:36pm |
Tow Vehicles
|
|
RE: All Ford Powerstroke owners, please watch this video
Went and picked up a new cap yesterday and, sure enough, I had the old style with the smaller spring on the truck. I was sure I would have one since we have a pre-2009 truck. I didn't bother having the old tested. I didn't want to know I was driving a ticking bomb these past 50,000+ miles. :E
|
sailor53
|
03/07/12 05:20pm |
Tow Vehicles
|
|
RE: Think I found one
It is not my intention to rain on your parade, but an '03 5'er would have a number of potential problems. Everything will, of course, be out of warranty and would be nearing the end of their service life.
You say the tires are dated 2002. These would need replacing at once or very soon at best. The roof would need close examination for wear and tear. The appliances, the refrigerator and A/C in particular, could be time bomb waiting to go off. These are all high price items that if they needed repair or replacement, would make the thought of the low purchase price a distant memory. Remember, you don't know how the previous owner took care of the trailer. I would at least want an extended warranty included in the sale.
These are things I would consider and they are my personal opinion that should be taken with a grain of salt. Many RV'ers have units much older then the one you are considering and are very happy with them.
Good luck with your search and choice. :B
|
sailor53
|
03/07/12 05:09pm |
Fifth-Wheels
|
|
